Lebanon — Working Paper Series

Posts tagged Lebanon

Refugee Protection Regimes: Comparative Report

Ela Gökalp Aras, Zeynep Şahin Mencütek - Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul | Evangelia Papatzani, Nadina Leivaditi, Electra Petracou - University of the Aegean

This comparative report is based on the RESPOND country reports [deliverable D3.1] that discusses the developments regarding legislation, policy measures and practices on refugee protection, but most importantly the implementation aspect in ten countries covered by the project (Austria, Germany, Greece, Iraq, Italy, Lebanon, Poland, Sweden, Turkey and the United Kingdom) for the 2011-2019 period. This report aims to provide a comparative analysis of refugee protection, emphasising the implementation aspect as drawn from the experiences and perceptions of meso and micro level actors. In doing so, the report offers analytical insights for evaluating the implications of the dynamics of refugee protection, which has undergone many changes since 2011.

Protection Regimes, Comparative ReportRESPOND Horizon2020August 7, 2020Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, University of the Aegean, Austria, Iraq, Italy, Poland, Lebanon, Germany, Greece, Sweden, Turkey, UKComment

Reception Policies, Practices & Responses: Comparative Reception Policy Typology

Alexander K. Nagel - Göttingen University | Prof. Ayhan Kaya - Bilgi University

In this comparative report we develop a typology of reception governance, which allows for a country comparative perspective on reception measures for refugees. The term “reception governance” is to comprise both reception policies (i.e. a system of principles to guide decisions), decision-making and actual practices. The main rationale for the construction of the typology is that reception governance does not constitute a policy field or domain…

Reception Policies, Policy Typology, Comparative ReportRESPOND Horizon2020June 8, 2020Bilgi University, Göttingen University, Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, Italy, Lebanon, Sweden, Turkey, UK, PolandComment

Reception Policies, Practices & Responses: SYNTHESIS Report

Prof. Ayhan Kaya - Bilgi University | Alexander K. Nagel - Göttingen University

In recent years, the so called “refugee crisis” has triggered considerable policy change in many countries along the Eastern Mediterranean route. We understand reception as a hybrid policy field with a strong attachment to social policy. In many countries, welfare production used to be (or has become) a highly collaborative endeavour which spans different levels of political decision making (e.g. national, regional and municipal) and involves a high degree of subcontracting and public-private collaboration. The previously published 11 country reports…

Reception Policies, Synthesis ReportRESPOND Horizon2020May 4, 2020Bilgi University, Göttingen University, Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, Italy, Lebanon, Poland, Sweden, Turkey, UKComment

Reception Policies, Practices & Responses: LEBANON Country Report

Karen Rahme | Lebanon Support

This report provides a contextual analysis of the provision of reception to asylum seekers in Lebanon, with a particular focus on the developments of the period spanning 2011 to 2019. Research findings highlight the absence of a comprehensive asylum reception regime, in favour of a set of formal and informal ad-hoc policies and decisions taken from 2014 onwards, with the specific aim of dissuading populations of concerns from settling in the country…

Reception PoliciesRESPOND Horizon2020April 17, 2020Lebanon Support, LebanonComment

Border Management and Migration Control – Comparative Report

Lena Karamanidou - Glasgow Caledonian University | Bernd Kasparek, Sabine Hess - Göttingen University

This report is the part of the WP 2.3 work package of RESPOND, which explores border management and migration controls in the eleven countries selected for the RESPOND project (Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, Italy, Lebanon, Poland, Sweden, Turkey and the United Kingdom) between 2011 and 2017. The current report provides a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks and policy implementation in these eleven countries, drawing on the national reports submitted as the second deliverable of WP2…

Comparative Report, Border ManagementRESPOND Horizon2020March 30, 2020Göttingen University, Glasgow Caledonian University, Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, Italy, Lebanon, Poland, Sweden, Turkey, UKComment

Refugee Protection Regimes: LEBANON Country Report

Karen Rahme | Lebanon Support

This report provides a contextual analysis of the provision of refugee protection in Lebanon. It highlights the absence of a comprehensive refugee protection legal framework, in favour of a set of formal and informal ad hoc policies, which are limited in scope and inclusivity. While the Lebanese polity is a signatory of international conventions1 calling for non-discriminatory protection, and non-refoulement, it falls short in practice with direct and indirect measures, breaching those very principles.

Protection RegimesRESPOND Horizon2020January 30, 2020Lebanon Support, LebanonComment

Border Management and Migration Controls in LEBANON Report

Amreesha Jagarnathsingh | Lebanon Support

This report seeks to analyse border and migration governance in Lebanon; it provides an overview of legislation and policies concerned with border management and control in Lebanon, by systematically analysing pre-entry controls, controls at the border, internal control regimes, and return policies.

Border ManagementRESPOND Horizon2020July 13, 2019Lebanon Support, LebanonComment

Comparative Report: Legal and Policy Framework of Migration Governance

Pannia, Paola; Federico, Veronica; Terlizzi, Andrea; D'Amato, Silvia et al | University of Florence

Law and Policy, Comparative ReportRESPOND Horizon2020August 1, 2018University of Florence, Italy, Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, Lebanon, Poland, Turkey, UK, Sweden

RESPOND WORKING PAPER SERIES

Navigate RESPOND’s Working Paper Series By:

funding

PROJECT COORDINATION